Statoil has put on hold two oil and gas projects in UK waters worth more than $10bn because of the government’s increased tax on oil production, the Financial Times reports. The Norwegian group said the tax rise, announced by George Osborne, chancellor of the exchequer, in last week’s Budget, was a “substantial setback” to the North Sea oil industry.
“The proposed tax change significantly impacts the economics of these projects.”
Statoil
It would “pause and reflect” on the future of its Mariner and Bressay fields to the south-east of Shetland in light of the decision, Statoil says in a statement: “The proposed tax change significantly impacts the economics of these projects. These are challenging fields, which were already economically marginal, so we need to assess how this tax increase impacts them and consider how to move forward.”
Statoil says it has been close to awarding engineering and design contracts for the Mariner field but this will now be suspended.
Mariner and Bressay hold several hundred million barrels of recoverable oil and Statoil have said erlier that their development would generate more than $10bn of investment.
Mr. Osborne dismissed suggestions that his £2bn tax grab on the oil industry would hit exploration: “Our expectation is it will not damage investment.”
The chancellor defends his plan to take money from the oil industry to keep down prices at the pump and dismiss warnings from MPs on the House of Commons Treasury committee that the move could cost thousands of jobs in the sector.
“With current oil prices, the prospects are for increased investment,” he says. “It’s still very profitable to invest to exploit these resources.”
Mr. Osborne said taxes on oil groups would decrease if the oil price fell to about $75 a barrel and would be recouped by a reintroduction of the fuel duty “escalator”, which progressively increases fuel duty.
The supplementary tax rate levied on oil and gas production has risen from 20 per cent to 32 per cent. This has increased the effective tax rate to at least 62 per cent, with some fields facing 81 per cent.
Statoil is to meet Treasury officials but Mr Osborne says it pays higher taxes in Norway.
Well…technically, yes. However Statoil is in principle, and practice, run by the Norwegian government who also is the major shareholder. There’s lot’s of hidden subsidicies in the Statoil system, so that issue is almost irrelevant.
Related Articles
- Statoil North Sea Oil firm in pullout over George Osborne’s budget tax (dailymail.co.uk)
- Statoil halts North Sea oil development over windfall tax (guardian.co.uk)
- Oil giant puts £10bn North Sea development on hold after Osborne’s tax raid (dailymail.co.uk)
Norway Consider Veto EU’s Bank Deposit Guarantee Directive
The Norwegian government is considering to use its veto against a new EU directive, setting a limit to the European banks deposit insurance guarantee. The proposed limit is EUR 100.000. The Norwegians banks, however, guarantees for up to EUR 250.000 of private citizens bank deposits. Norwegian minister of finance, Sigbjørn Johnsen, refuse to accept the upcoming regulations from Brussels, and says that he is considering using Norway’s right to veto any new EU directives for a period of 12 months if an agreement is not possible. If that turns out to be the case, it will be the first time Norway use its veto rights in the EU parliament.
“Yes, the veto is even considered. But the main track is to get through with our views.”
Sigbjørn Johnsen
Norwegian minister of Finance, Sigbjørn Johnsen, met on Thursday afternoon with the German MEP, Peter Simon, who is preparing the new EU directive on bank insurance guarantees for the EU parliament. Mr. Johnsen also met with MEP Burkhard Balz. “They were both nice guys,” Johsens says. “They fully understand the arguments we have, but time will tell if we get through with our case.” the experienced minister adds.
Mr. Sigbjørn Johnsen was also minister of finance in the early 90’s, and was the one who had to deal with the Scandinavian bank crisis in Norway.
In an interview with the Norwegian newspaper “Nationen,” Friday, he says the Norwegian government will consider using its veto rights to block the upcoming new EU directive on European banks deposit insurance guarantee.
The new directive, which Norway is obligated to adapt according to The EEA Agreement of 1992, sets a limit to the banks deposit guarantee of 100.000 euro.
That’s about the above the average guarantee in most European Area countries, but Norway has the highest deposit guarantee of all, equal to about 250.000 euro.
The directive is being processed by the European Parliament at the moment, and EU’s Finance Committee is scheduled to submit its recommendations March 17.
According to Johnson that means that all political groups will conclude on the case by the end of February.
The newspaper Nationen also writes that Norway plans to contact several other groups, not just the Social Democrats and Christian Democrats – who are the two largest political parties in the EU parliament.
“What we’re doing now is using all the relations we have inside the EU system. When the EU finance commissioner, Michel Barnier, comes to visit Norway later on this winter, it will also be on the agenda. We have to see what the final result is. Then we’ll decide what to do – or not to do,” Johnsen says.
“Is it a veto relevant?”
“Yes, the veto is even considered. But our main track is to get through with our views.”
Fear of Flying Money
EU finance commissioner Michel Barnier has on several occasions said that he EU worries about the Norwegian deposit guarantee, that it will result in a flight of capital.
The possibility that such movements of small deposits, followed by large deposits, might lead to a domino effect of falling banks, according to the EU.
However, Mr. Johnsen argues that an investigation of capital movements between the Nordic countries show that the Norwegian insurance scheme, (which is substantially better than in the other Nordic countries), do not have anti-competitive effects.
A Bank Champions League
To will protect bank customers.
To make it easier for the regulators to shut down a bank, who actually should have been closed, as customers know that their deposits are protected when the bank declare bankruptcy.
Lastra believes it is important to figure out how large national banks, with branches in several countries, both in and outside the EU, should be handled.
She proposes a “Champions League” solution, in which large international banks have an EU deposit guarantee, while the national banks have a national deposit guarantee.
No Comments
No other members of the Norwegian government are willing to comment on the finance ministers statements.
Related Articles:
7 Comments
Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, National Economic Politics
Tagged as Burkhard Balz, European Parliament, European Union, Finance minister, Financial Markets, International Econnomic Politics, International Politics, Jens Stoltenberg, Law & Regulations, Macro Economics, Michel Barnier, National Politics, Nordic countries, Norway, Politics of Norway, Sigbjørn Johnsen, Views, commentaries and opinions