Former derivative trader at Lehman Brothers and founder of Re-Define,Kapoor, has been trying for years to explain to European governments how they can handle the financial crisis and create a new sustainable economy – on both national and international level. But sadly they don’t seem to have been listening to the experienced financial expert. In a recent published article it seems like Mr. Kapoor is about to give up on the whole euro zone and its politicians.
“Instead of reacting decisively to reduce uncertainty, our political leaders have done the exact opposite.”
“When Lehman Brothers collapsed, no one knew which bank would be next. Counter-parties lost faith in all measures of the soundness of banks. Under such a scenario, the only course of action that made sense was to hold one’s money close to the chest. This individually rational response was collectively disastrous. The uncertainty around the size and distribution of potential losses led to systemic collapse. Something similar has been unfolding in the euro zone banking and sovereign debt crisis albeit in slow motion,” Mr. Kapoor writes.
I first met Sony Kapoor about three years ago, a few months after the historical bankruptcy at Lehman Brothers, as he was working on setting up the headquarter for his international think-tank, Re-Define, in Oslo, Norway.
Kapoor had left Lehman Brothers in 2005, because, he said, felt uncomfortable with the things he was doing at Lehman.
He is also a former Member of the Boards of Directors of Eurodad (European Network on Debt and Development) and the International Tax Justice Network which he also helped set up.
He played a leading policy and advocacy role in the multilateral debt cancellation deal reached in 2005, recently he has been an influential voice in shaping the discussion on innovative sources of financing, and helped driving the international agenda on tackling capital flight and tax havens.
As I introduced him to leading Norwegian market participants, we both agreed that a new global financial and monetary system is urgently needed. Mr. Kapoor had already been acting as a consultant for several European governments, and seemed optimistic about future.
(You may want to read his comprehensive – 112 pages – analysis of the financial crisis; “The Financial Crisis – Causes & Cures”)
It is therefore with some sadness I publish his recent commentary, in which he points out that the politicians of Europe have done exactly the opposite of what they should have done, and completely dismissed his advise.
He says it’s like watching the collapse of his former employer all over again – only this time in slow motion.
Anyway – here’s the full post, called:
The Shadow Fiscal Union
The failure to draw a line under the crisis has meant that the continuing uncertainty around the size and distribution of losses in the euro zone is hemorrhaging our economy.
The size of this deadweight economic loss, with all its human cost, is increasing with every additional day of inaction.
Political dithering and mixed messages have ensured that no one knows how, when or where these losses will materialize.
Under these circumstances, it is rational for investors to keep their distance.
They are penalizing both sovereigns exposed to weak financial institutions and financial institutions exposed to troubled sovereigns.
They assume the worst for both, but this collective fear is far in excess of the worst possible realistic economic outcome.
Increased Human Costs
States and banks with healthier balance sheets have got caught in the crossfire.
Instead of reacting decisively to reduce uncertainty, our political leaders have done the exact opposite.
Their continuing dithering has increased the absolute economic and human cost of the crisis.
“Mixed messages, a seeming lack of competence and a decision to focus on issues such as competitiveness that at best tangential to crisis resolution today have increased uncertainty with grave economic consequences.”
This is bad economics.
Euro-federalists have suggested everything from minimalist E-bonds to a complete fiscal union. At the other end, some skeptics have even called for kicking troubled countries out of the euro zone.
Political expediency and economic logic rules out any break-up of the euro zone, and political stalemate and public opinion stand in the way of a fully fledged fiscal union.
Our political leaders have instead chosen to gamble taxpayer funds with abandon.
They are taking on ever-increasing amounts of liabilities on public balance sheets in the EU.
This happened not just when countries rescued their banks the first time round and again when a deteriorating situation in Greece led to a ‘rescue package’ for Greece. This was less a bailout of the Greek sovereign but more an indirect bailout of banks in Germany and France exposed to Greek bonds.
Ireland, having foolishly issued guarantees for its financial sector, was forced by the ECB and the EU to honor these with the consequence that an otherwise sound Irish sovereign was dragged down by its hemorrhaging banking system. Bondholders have been made whole.
Taxpayers are being made to pay.
A Shadow Fiscal Union
The loans provided to Greece, the ECB’s purchase of Euro zone sovereign bonds, and the creation of the European Financial Stability Mechanism (EFSM), have all shifted the risk of losses from creditors to the taxpayers of troubled member states underwritten by the taxpayers of member states with more sound finances.
An opaque “shadow fiscal union” has been created but no one bothered asking the voters.
“The official discourse is that both creditors and taxpayers from countries such as Germany will be fully repaid in time. Since this is not possible, this public stance is irresponsible and probably dishonest.#
With debt burdens bigger than their economies, and growth rates below or close to zero and skyrocketing borrowing costs, the only choice for Greece and Ireland will be to restructure outstanding debts by rescheduling or imposing significant haircuts on creditors.
“Creditor losses are likely to run into tens of billions (hundreds if Spain and Portugal also seek aid) of Euros.”
When they hit taxpayers in Germany and France, it will be a serious body blow to the eroding trust that EU citizens have in their leaders.
Bad Economics – Bad
Even more important, it would also poison member states’ relations with each other, perhaps irreparably.
“Losses at the ECB will damage its credibility inflicting additional damage to the Euro project.”
This is bad politics.
Delaying this inevitable restructuring of Greek and Irish will simply increase the losses to EU taxpayers.
Too much has already been given away to creditors and too much has already been taken away from taxpayers.
Let the March summit signal the end of the era of bad economics and bad politics.
By Sony Kapoor
Related by the Econotwist’s:
- Are We Facing A Political Crisis, Too?
- Europe In Debt (Part 2): Poisonous PIIGS With Toxic Lipstick
- Europe In Debt (Part 1): Creating a Monster
- Europe In Debt (Part 3): Exit On Main Street
- Report: Financial Crisis Could Have Been Avoided
- British MEP To Parliament: “Just Who The Hell Do You Think You Are? You Are Very Dangerous People!”
- Goodbye Keynes – Hello Ricardo!
- Global Economy On Fast Track To Disaster
- DAVOS-Lobster in the mountains, riots on the Nile – Reuters (news.google.com)
- Three Lessons of the Lehman Brothers Collapse (time.com)
- Lessons learned? (bbc.co.uk)
- ECB sees prices rising, no more alarmed than in January (reuters.com)
- When (derivatives) counterparties collapse (ftalphaville.ft.com)