Tag Archives: Sovereign wealth fund

Qatar In Talks To Buy Parts Of Argentina And Ukraine

Remember all the fuzz earlier this year when German politicians suggested that Greece should sell a few islands to pay off its debt? Well, in Qatar they obviously like the basic idea; according to Reuters, the wealthy emirate is now in talks with the governments of Argentina and Ukraine to but parts of the land – for cereals production…

“Food is becoming a big business.”

Mahendra Shah


Qatar is in preliminary talks with the governments of Argentina and Ukraine to buy farmland for cereals production, the head of the Gulf Arab state’s national food security programme,  Mahendra Shah, says in an interview with Reuters.

The deals would be worth “$100 million-plus each”, Mahendra says.

The acquisitions are part of Qatar’s drive to secure its food supplies by investing in agricultural projects abroad, Reuters reports .

Qatar imports 95 percent of its food and has only two days’ worth of water reserves.

It relies on imports, and is constantly looking at options to gain additional food and water resources through Hassad Food, the agricultural arm of its sovereign wealth fund.

Have Already Bought Parts Of Brazil And Australia

“We have done deals in Brazil and Australia and now we are in negotiations with Argentina and Ukraine,” the director of Qatar National Food Security Programme says.

“These are countries that are willing to sell their land to grow cereals,” he adds.

As criticism has mounted over the past two years of so-called “land-grab” deals, where rich food-importing countries buy land in poorer nations, Qatar had focused on richer countries with more abundant land and stronger legislation, where its investments would be less controversial, according to Shah.

Zimbabwe For Sale?

He also says that Qatar is keen to develop partnerships with target countries, which would foster their development and improve the livelihoods of local farmers.

“I think a lot of countries are rethinking their strategy. If you are being criticized for transferring food insecurity from your own country to another one, then you may want to go where there is less criticism,” he says.

“On the other hand, the countries that really, desperately need agricultural investment are in Africa.” he points out.

Big Shock – Big Business

Hassad Food was established in 2008 by the Qatar Investment Authority with $1 billion capital, as a spike in food prices led the rich oil states, as well as countries like China and South Korea, to look for additional food supplies and farmland abroad.

In 2010 Qatar plans to invest between $500 million and $700 million in agricultural projects.

However, Mahendra Shah says that there is “flexibility” to increase” its financial war chest.

With international prices of wheat, maize and rice rising over the past few weeks on the back of drought in Russia and flooding in Pakistan, he says Qatar’s strategy have been proved to be far-sighted.

“Food is becoming a big business. We had the first shock in 2008 and now what happened over summer proved that this kind of shocks will be repeated and that we were right,” Mr. Shah says.

The Investment Of The Future

Shah says Qatar is also studying a project on how to raise sheep for meat production in Sudan, where last year it created a joint venture to cultivate up to 250,000 acres of land for wheat, corn and possibly soya.

Shah was speaking on the sidelines of a high-level intergovernmental meeting of the UN’s Committee on Food Security in Rome, where land rights and sustainable agricultural investments is on the top of the agenda.

He says Qatar wants to seal partnerships with the host countries, under which not more than 40% of the food production would be shipped back to the Gulf Arab state in order to promote local development and help farmers.

The Investment Of The Past

However, this kind of agreement is really not a completely new thing.

In 1978 the Korean Overseas Development Corporation bought 20.894 hectares of pampas some 1.000 km northwest of the Argentinian capital, Buenos Aires.

The Korean government paid  $2,115,000 for the land.

The Koreans sent 300 farmers to Argentina with the visions of building a Korean village in South America.

Well, there’s a slightly difference between both soil and the climate on the two opposite parts of the Earth.

Something the Koreans forgot.

In summer it was sizzling hot with temperatures soaring over 40 degrees Celsius. In winter there were severe temperature swings and many mornings of frost.

The biggest problem was that the land contained salt.  (The fact that a small river flowing through the area is called “Salado,” meaning salty, might have been a little hint..).

The project ended in failure, and the land has remained neglected for more than 30 years.

Still, the Korean government has been sending $12.000 to Argentina every year for management costs and taxes.

A New Trend?

So, if buying foreign land will be the next great investment opportunity remains to be seen.

But it may be something we’ll see more of in the years to come.

In the recent proposal for the 2011 National Budget, the Norwegian Finance Ministry announced the establishment of a new Strategy Council. The Strategy Council has been asked to write a report on the long term investment strategy of Norway’s SWF (Government Pension Fund Global) and present this no later than 1 December 2010.

Meanwhile, the big Sovereign Wealth Funds are putting their money where the money is – of course.

In the financial sector that is – of course.

Data from our Sovereign Wealth Fund Transaction Database shows that almost 30% of the SWF investments over the last four quarters have been in the financial sector.

 

(Source: Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute)

 

 

And more than 60% of all SWF investments are now in the financial industry. (Still no green shots?)

And the total amount invested by Sovereign Wealth Funds seems to be significant lower this year compared to 2008 and 2009, the figures suggest.

.

What’s next?

1 Comment

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics, Technology

Citigroup Sued by Norway's Central Bank

Norway’s central bank have sued Citigroup Inc along with Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit and Chairman Richard Parsons over a $835 million loss in Citigroup stock and bonds.

“The complaint is based largely on the ongoing class action lawsuit against Citigroup.”

Bunny Nooryani


Citigroup misrepresented its financial condition and failed to disclose material information, leading Norges Bank to buy Citigroup stock and bonds at inflated prices between January 2007 and January 2009, the Norwegian central bank says in the lawsuit filed at the US District Court in Manhattan.

“Citi’s near-demise had its genesis in the company’s increasing willingness to take on risk for the sake of profit, without regard for – and without disclosing  – the magnitude of the downside exposure it faced if those risks materialized,” the central bank writes in the complaint, labeled “Norges Bank v. Citigroup; 10-cv-07202”.

The Pension Fund (Again)

Through its investment arm, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (NBIM), the world’s second-biggest sovereign wealth fund, posted a record 633 billion kroner ($107.6 billion) loss in 2008, wiping out gains since the fund started investing the country’s oil revenue in 1996.

The so-called oil fund had a 26 percent return last year.

The central bank’s lawsuit names 20 of Citigroup’s current and former directors and executives, including former CEO Charles “Chuck” Prince.

The Norwegian Pension Fund is about to become famous for its controversial investment strategy – being one of the largest shareholders in the ruined oil company BP, and have lately invested large sums in Greek bonds.

Best Served In Court

– We confirm that Norges Bank has filed an individual claim against Citigroup in federal court in New York. The complaint is based largely on the ongoing class action lawsuit against Citigroup,” Bunny Nooryani, communications manger at NBIM says, according to the website DN.no.

The Norwegian central bank also confirms the size of the loss.

“Norges Bank’s complaint tracks, in large part, the complaint filed in the securities class action lawsuit currently pending against Citigroup, but Norges Bank believes it will be better served by pursuing its own direct action,” she says in a telephone interview with Bloomberg.

The central bank is also a plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit, Ms.  Nooryani adds.

The lawsuit adds to a group of other pending complaints against Citigroup for losses suffered by investors.

The New York-based bank, today the fourth-largest U.S. bank by deposits, announced “significant declines” in its $55 billion of subprime holdings on November 4th, 2007, and reported a $9.8 billion loss for the last quarter of 2007, compared with a $5.1 billion net profit the previous year.

The bank had a net loss of $27.7 billion in 2008 and received a $45 billion bailout from US taxpayers.

The Securities and Exchange Commission sued Citigroup in a separate case in July, claiming that the bank, now 18 percent- owned by U.S. taxpayers, had misled investors by not disclosing over $40 billion in subprime-related holdings during 2007.

Citigroup agreed to a $75 million fine in a settlement that was approved by a federal judge Friday.

Four Small Towns Went Bankrupt

In the aftermath of the US subprime crises, four small Norwegian towns practically went bankrupt after investing in subprime-related financial instruments issued by Citygroup.

The local administrations in these Norwegian small town have already tried to sue Citygroup over their losses, but have gotten nowhere, and are now a part of the ongoing class action suit against the global giant.

Vigorous Defense

“We believe the suit has no merit and will defend ourselves vigorously,” Citigroup spokeswoman Danielle Romero- Apsilos says in a statement.

“We believe that such lawsuits are baseless and will defend ourselves intensely,” Citigroup spokesman Jeffrey French writes in an email to DN.no.

Citigroup executives repeatedly stated in conferences calls in 2007 that the bank had reduced its subprime exposure by 45 percent to $13 billion.

The figure omitted “super-senior” tranches of collateralized debt obligations and financial guarantees called liquidity puts that added more than $40 billion in subprime exposure, according to the SEC’s complaint.

Gary Crittenden, 57, the bank’s chief financial officer, agreed to pay $100,000 in a separate settlement with the SEC. Arthur Tildesley, former head of Citigroup’s investor relations, paid $88,000.

Crittenden is named as a defendant in Norges Bank’s lawsuit.

Citigroup’s shares fell 93 percent over the period during which the Norwegian central bank claimed the bank made its misleading disclosures, closing at $3.83 on Jan. 15, 2009, compared with $54.50 two years previously.

Citigroup’s 5.85 percent bonds sold in August 2006 and maturing 10 years later lost 0.8 percent during that period.

The Norwegian spokeswoman, Bunny Nooryani, declined to give further details on the amount sought in compensation or why the bank believes it will be better served pursuing its own lawsuit.

Related by the Econotwist:

Norway’s Government Pension Fund Takes $25bn Hit

Norway’s Oil Fund Among BP’s Largest Shareholders As Bankruptcy Rumors Hit Market

Norwegian Pensioners Enter Bear Market

Here’s The REAL Norwegian PIIGS Exposure

*

9 Comments

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics

China To Invest In Nassim Taleb's Bear Fund

It’s a pretty strong signal: China’s Sovereign-Wealth Fund is in talks with Black-Swan-author Nassim Taleb’s Hedge Fund, Universa’s Bearish Wagers, The Wall Street Journal reports. China is said to be willing to invest between 6 and 10 billion dollar in the fund that gives a payout of  60% if the market drops 20%. Some of the world’s biggest investors are planning to do the same.

“Stocks are not a robust investment. Make sure you have a garden that bears fruits.”

Nassim Nicolas Taleb


The famous author, philosopher and Wall Street trader, professor Nassim Nicholas Taleb was in his native northern Lebanon last week, thinking about instability in the pricing of goods and services. He suggests that investors around the world strap in for a wild ride of deflation and inflation. And says it therefore makes sense for him to pour money into farming, especially olives, which are indispensable to the Mediterranean world.

The mathematical finance scholar who lectures at New York University and wrote the 2007 book “The Black Swan” says he is as pessimistic as ever about the prospects for sustained global economic recovery.

He suggests that investors around the world strap in for a wild ride of deflation and inflation. And, therefore, he said, it makes sense for him to pour money into farming, especially olives, which are indispensable to the Mediterranean world, The Wall Street Journal writes.

“Healthy investments are those that produce goods that humans need to consume, not flat-screen TVs,” Mr. Taleb says over the phone from near his family’s ancestral home in Amioun.

“Stocks are not a robust investment. Make sure you have a garden that bears fruits.”

In For A Wild Ride

Nassim Nicholas Taleb also says investors around the world should strap in for a wild ride of deflation and inflation.

Some of the world’s biggest investors are planting the same seeds, according to WSJ.com.

The Santa Monica, Calif., investment firm Mr. Taleb helped start and still advises, Universa Investments LP, is in talks with China’s $300 billion sovereign-wealth fund, China Investment Corp., and Middle East government funds about investing in Universa, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Specifically, sovereign-wealth funds are willing to pay the firm in the hopes that if the market dives, at least some part of their portfolio will profit.

Panic is a profit-driver for Mr. Taleb, who has gained renown for his pessimism, a viewpoint that proved prescient in the market collapse of 2008.

The interest from the likes of the Chinese and Middle East funds, which control some of the world’s biggest pools of money, suggests more mainstream adoption of Universa’s bearish conviction.

The outcome of the talks isn’t certain, according to a person familiar with the matter.

But if the investments materialize, they likely would boost the Universa fund’s client assets from $6 billion to about $10 billion, two people familiar with the matter says.

CIC didn’t respond to a request for comment by the WSJ.

“Healthy investments are those that produce goods that humans need to consume, not flat-screen TVs. … Stocks are not a robust investment. Make sure you have a garden that bears fruits.”

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of ‘The Black Swan’

Read the full post at The Swapper.

Related by the Econotwist:

Espen Haug: “Strategic Reserves”

Welcome To The Double-Dip!

A Report To Make You Go “Hmmm…”

Investors; Fasten Your Seatbelts!

So, You Thought BP Was An OIL Company?

2010 Analysis: “11 Black Swans”

China: “Mother of All Black Swans”

New Testimony From Taleb

Nassim Taleb’s Favorite Books

2010 Analysis: The Road to Disaster

Paul Tudor Jones Swings Sword And Use The “F-Word”

*

*

Select Your Language:

Français * Italiano * Deutsch * Português * Español* Русский * العربية * Svenska* 中文 * 日本語

3 Comments

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics