Under the pseudonym “Hugo Cornwall”,Peter Sommer published the infamous “Hacker’s Handbook” in 1985. Since then he has become a noted security researcher and expert witness. Now he has co-authored a report for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) which warns governments against swallowing wholesale stories about “cyber-war” and “cyber-weapons”.
“Governments should take a calm, disciplined approach and evaluate the risks of each type of attack very carefully rather than be swayed by scare stories.”
Peter Sommer
According to the report “Reducing Systemic Cybersecurity Risk,” published today, a true cyber-war would have the same destructive effects as a conventional war, only that it will be fought exclusively in cyberspace. However, such a war is “highly unlikely” to occur, the OECD report says.
“Governments should take a calm, disciplined approach and evaluate the risks of each type of attack very carefully rather than be swayed by scare stories,” says Peter Sommer of the London
School of Economics, one of the two authors of the just released report on cyber security.
Co-authored with computer scientist Ian Brown of the Oxford Internet Institute, UK, the report says online attacks are unlikely ever to have global significance on the scale of, say, a disease pandemic or a run on the banks.
But they say “localized misery and loss” could be caused by a successful attack on the Internets routing structure, which governments must ensure are defended with investment in cyber-security training.
Jay Abbott, security manager at the consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers, agrees that the routing structure is indeed vulnerable, new scientist.com writes.
“Short of physically cutting the wires, it’s the best way to take down a country from the internet,” he says.
Analysis of cyber-security issues has been weakened by the lack of agreement on terminology and the use of exaggerated language, the report points out.
“Cyber-espionage is not a few keystrokes away from cyber-war, it is a method of spying,” the authors write.
Controversially, the OECD advises nations against adopting the Pentagon’s idea of setting up a military division – as it has under the auspices of the US air force‘s Space Command – to fight cyber-security threats.
“While vested interests may want to see taxpayers’ money spent on such ventures,” says Sommer, “the military can only defend its own networks, not the private-sector critical networks we all depend on for gas, water, electricity and banking.”
Here’s a copy of the report: “Reducing Systemic Cyber Security Risk”
.
.
I just have one question: Who will decide which hardware, computers and software that is “systemically important,” or not?
Related by The Swapper:
- Internet Nuke Bomb Ready To Blow (Update)
- Cyber Criminals Attack Critical Water, Oil and Gas Systems
- The REAL Weapon of Mass Destruction
- Report: Details On China’s Internet Hijacking
- Hey, You HFT Bashers! Are You Ready For This?
- “Artificial Intelligence” To Be Implemented In HFT
- The Ultimate Trading Weapon
- A Hompage For The Homeless
- WikiLeaks: The Diversion of A Decade?
.
Related Articles:
- Cyberwar countermeasures a waste of money, says report (newscientist.com)
- Cyber attacks could create “perfect storm:” OECD (canada.com)
- Internet ‘kill switch’ could cause chaos, OECD report warns (infoworld.com)
- OECD: Cyber attacks could create perfect storm (theglobeandmail.com)
- Cyber Attacks Set to Increase (blogs.wsj.com)
Pingback: Success of Backlinks – Easy Way to Get Success and Money | money making blog
Pingback: World Spinner