Tag Archives: Human rights

New Year – New Focus

First of all: Thanks to all followers of the econoTwist’s TWISTED blog! You know that the purpose of this blog is to raise awareness about the increasing threats from cyberspace. And it seems like my small contribution has contributed to just that. Cyber security is now on the agenda amongst most leading politicians, authorities and regulators. The topic has also found its way to the headlines of the mainstream media.

This does not mean that my work here is done. But I’ve decided to change my main focus for 2013 towards another serious threat; the threat against one of the basic human rights, the freedom of speech. Including freedom of the Press, (both off and online), and media pluralism.

Never before has so many journalist been jailed as in 2012, never before have so many journalist got killed as in 2012. Strong forces, not seen in the media industry before,  are now trying to gain control over the internet, control the information, bloggers and independent writers are under pressure, the mainstream media, too, and never before has so few publishers dominated the mass media market, large corporations who belive that the sole purpose of media is to advertize and sell stuff.

It’s a real threat to our democracy.

So, here we go: Introducing RATIONAL ARROGANCE – a brand new WordPress blog, dedicated to this particular subject. EconoTwist’s style, of course…

Click the pick and check it out!



The econoTwist’s TWISTED site will still be updated, but not as frequently as before. And some stories will be published at both sites.

For those of you who would like to keep an eye on me and my writings, I recommend following my Twitter accounts; “fhxx” or “econotwist”.

I wish you all a happy new year!



Filed under Laws and Regulations, Philosophy

Another Controversial Peace Price; Full Statement

The Norwegian Nobel Peace Price Committee made another controversial announcement Friday, awarding the Nobel Peace Price of 2010 to the Chinese imprisoned Liu Xiaobo. It is believed that an award to Liu put an uncomfortable spotlight on China’s dictatorship.

“He has been a strong advocate for that basic human rights should also apply in China,”  chairman of the Nobel Committee, Torbjorn Jagland, says announcing the winner.

Xiaobo has been the biggest favorite to receive the prestigious award this year.

However, he is also the candidate that Chinese authorities have feared the most.

Last a week a representative of China’s foreign ministry said that a prize award to Liu would be “inappropriate” since he was sentenced to 11 years in prison.

It is believed that an award to Liu put an uncomfortable spotlight on China’s dictatorship.

This is the formal statement from the Norwegian Peace Price Committee:

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2010 to Liu Xiaobo for his long and non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China. The Norwegian Nobel Committee has long believed that there is a close connection between human rights and peace. Such rights are a prerequisite for the “fraternity between nations” of which Alfred Nobel wrote in his will.

Over the past decades, China has achieved economic advances to which history can hardly show any equal. The country now has the world’s second largest economy; hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty. Scope for political participation has also broadened.

China’s new status must entail increased responsibility. China is in breach of several international agreements to which it is a signatory, as well as of its own provisions concerning political rights. Article 35 of China’s constitution lays down that “Citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration”. In practice, these freedoms have proved to be distinctly curtailed for China’s citizens.

For over two decades, Liu Xiaobo has been a strong spokesman for the application of fundamental human rights also in China. He took part in the Tiananmen protests in 1989; he was a leading author behind Charter 08, the manifesto of such rights in China which was published on the 60th anniversary of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the 10th of December 2008. The following year, Liu was sentenced to eleven years in prison and two years’ deprivation of political rights for “inciting subversion of state power”. Liu has consistently maintained that the sentence violates both China’s own constitution and fundamental human rights.

The campaign to establish universal human rights also in China is being waged by many Chinese, both in China itself and abroad. Through the severe punishment meted out to him, Liu has become the foremost symbol of this wide-ranging struggle for human rights in China.

Oslo, October 8, 2010

I guess the Norwegian Embassy in Beijing will have busy day, today, as several Chinese official calls in threats to boycott import of Volvo cars, or cancel the deliverance of IKEA-furniture…   

Anyway – here’s alleged Soviet mole Thorbjørn Jagland (code name JURI) saying the Lutheran Nobel Committee is above both Government and Parliament, as he answers question from the international press:

Select Your Language:

Arabic * Chinese * Danish * English * French * German * Hebrew * Italian * Japanese * Norwegian * Portuguese * Russian * Spanish * Swedish * Turkish

1 Comment

Filed under International Econnomic Politics

Experts: Afgahn War Is "Unwinnable"

An additional $33 billion is heading to fund the Afghan war efforts. The move was approved by the U.S. Congress today.  The whopping cash injection comes after a leak of tonnes of classified military documents, revealing a barrage of human rights violations during the campaign.

Dr. David Kilcullen at the Center for New American Security and other experts are now sounding the alarm; saying the US should pack up and leave, as the war’s fast becoming unwinnable.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments Off on Experts: Afgahn War Is "Unwinnable"

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics