Tag Archives: Beijing

Analysis: The Real Currency War

The United States believes the Chinese government keeps its currency artificially weak. China shows little interest in listening to criticism and will probably only allow a small appreciation of its currency through the next year. It had probably been best to have a common global solution to the currency issue, but this seems now unlikely, currency expert Camilla Viland at DnB NOR Markets writes in her latest analysis.

“The criticism of quantitative easing bottoms probably largely in fear of a weaker dollar.”

Camilla Viland

“The most likely outcome in our eyes is that you can not find a common solution. China is likely to let its currency appreciate, but at their own pace, a pace they are comfortable with – and that is slow. This means that the adjustments of global imbalances will be a long and heavy process,” Camilla Viland at DnB NOR Markets writes.

Interventions in the foreign exchange market of Japan and emerging economies such as Asia has contributed to a debate about whether we are facing an international currency war.

The debate has again raised the tug of war between China and the United States and focus on global imbalances.

Japanese yen has been one of the “winners” in the foreign exchange market in the last three years.

An important reason for the trend is currency’s status as a safe haven in the currency market.

However, in mid-September the Japanese central bank intervened in the forex market for the first time in six years to prevent the further strengthening of the Japanese currency.

Also other currencies of emerging economies (including in Asia) has strengthened.

“The reason for this is that low-interest rates in western countries have investors to place their money in other countries where the returns are better,” Ms. Viland points out.

Adding: “This has resulted in a sharp increase in capital inflow to emerging economies.”

Now, several of these countries have followed Japan’s example and intervened in the currency market to weaken their own currencies.

This was the reason why Brazil’s finance minister, Guido Mantega, the end of September, warned that an international currency, war has broken out, which has received considerable attention in the markets.

“However, we believe that the fear of an international currency war, in which countries use all means to weaken its own currency, is excessive. G7 countries have repeatedly stated their belief that exchange rates should reflect fundamental economic conditions and in this lies a strong commitment to not intervene actively in the foreign exchange market to affect their own exchange rate,” the DnB NOR analyst says.

The ongoing debate about the currency of war has again raised the tug of war between the US and China and focus on global imbalances.

Several years of high consumption, low savings rates and expansionary fiscal policy has contributed to large government deficits in the US.

In the same period, China has grown rapidly and had large current account surpluses.

The Chinese surpluses have largely been invested in US assets, including government securities.

“But how long can the US be dependent on other countries’ savings? And how long will countries like China, find it appropriate to set their savings funds available to the US? The situation is probably not sustainable in the long-term and the large imbalances between countries should be adjusted,” Camilla Viland notes.

China operates a fixed exchange rate, measured against a basket of currencies, determined by China’s foreign trade.

“This is certainly the official policy, but if it is actually practiced is more uncertain,” Ms. Viland says, and explains:

* “Many believe that regardless of China through its fixed exchange rate regime keeps its currency, the yuan artificially weak. A weak currency is good for the Chinese economy as it improves the country’s competitiveness relative to other countries.”

* “The Chinese foreign policy has been criticized by the international community, especially the United States. Americans want a stronger yuan to improve its competitiveness, which can reduce the large U.S. trade deficit and ease the country’s large debt burden. On the other hand, the U.S. depends on China are still willing to finance the country’s large public deficit.”

* “China defends himself with a quick appreciation of the currency could lead to export-oriented businesses must close down, which could lead to increased unemployment and social unrest. China also claims that the US is not much better even when they perceive the quantitative easing as a form of currency intervention.”

* “The criticism of quantitative easing bottoms probably largely in fear of a weaker dollar as this will have major negative consequences for China’s financial assets in dollars.”

China also showed great opposition when the United States introduced the extraordinary monetary policy measures in 2009, standing in front of the debate on an alternative international reserve currency.

Although there is wide interest differentials between countries, it is also a strong dependence, which contributes to the constant friction.

But the situation is not completely locked, according to the Norwegian analyst.

“China probably sees some advantages to a stronger currency, and can probably accept such a development if it does not get too large a negative impact on Chinese economy and the trend towards better living standards for Chinese persists. But it is very important to the Chinese that they can choose how much and how fast the currency will appreciate,” she emphasises.

In June China went out and said that their fixed exchange rate system should be made more flexible. Many hoped this meant a steady and gradual strengthening of the yuan.

Since then, the currency appreciated by about 2 percent against the dollar. This has not been enough to calm the critics.

A Common Solution?

It generally seems as if both parties focus primarily on their own interests in this conflict, DnB NOR Markets rightfully points out.

The DnB NOR analyst believes it would be much better if the involved managed to reach an agreement to a common solution.

The turmoil in the foreign exchange market was discussed at last weekend’s meeting,  organized by the IMF and World Bank, but without concrete results.

In November, the leaders of the G20 countries meet, and the currency issue will be on the agenda again.

“However, we are skeptical whether it will get something out of this. Some believe the G20 is too big and that maybe it is more likely to reach an agreement within the G7 China. But the G7 is becoming a less important forums and we do not think this is a likely outcome. An alternative may be to give the IMF a larger and more formal role,” Ms. Viland writes.

After last weekend’s IMF/World Bank meeting, it was announced that the IMF will publish reports that emphasize the relationships between economies.

“The IMF should also expand efforts investigations capital flows, changes in exchange rates and the structure of foreign exchange reserves in the world,” Viland comments, and says “this is positive, but the IMF generally struggling to get countries to follow their recommendations and to achieve this, the IMF should have more formal influence.”

China is an important player in this game, as they generally have stood in the way of reforms in its currency system.

It’s probably unlikely they will change stance on this now, DnB NOR assumes.

“The most likely outcome in our eyes is that you can not find a common solution. China is likely to let its currency appreciate, but at a pace they determine and are comfortable with-that is slow. This means that the adjustments of global imbalances will be a long and heavy process.”

From Currency War To Trade War?

The big fear is that the ongoing conflicts in the currency market developes into a trade war in which countries apply protectionist measures to support their own economy.

There have been some signs that we have moved in that direction, DnB NOR Markets confirms.

In relation to the financial crisis, the US government (among others) have provided selective support to US companies, and called for purchase of US goods.

And for a few weeks ago, the House of Representatives proposed a penalty tariffs on Chinese goods. The decision will be made in the Senate, in November.

“Nevertheless, it seems as if Americans want to stay within the WTO framework. Past experience suggests that protectionism may reinforce an economic crisis, and there are indications that the world economy will try to avoid the outbreak of a global trade war. We therefore believe this is not a likely outcome.” Camilla Viland writes.

An important step to resolve the ongoing conflicts in the foreign exchange market is the Chinese currency, according to DnB NOR Markets.

“However, we expect no major changes in the Chinese currency policy in the future. The exchange rate will still be used as a political tool, and with signs of slower growth in China, the government will hardly accept a faster appreciation of the currency going forward. War of words between the U.S. and China will likely to continue, but that’s all. We consider the likelihood that it will develop into a comprehensive trade war as small,” Camilla Viland at  DnB NOR Markets, concludes.

More from DnB NOR Markets:

Related by The Swapper:


Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics

Peace Prize: China Furious, Hectic Diplomacy, Wife Disappears

The Norwegian ambassador to Chine was – as expected – called in on the carpet of Chinese authorities yesterday, after the Norwegian Peace Prize Committee awarded the Nobel Peace Prize of 2010 to the Chinese imprisoned freedom fighter, Liu Xiaobo.

“If a Norwegian free-trade agreement with China collapses, the Norwegian fishing industry could lose about NOK 380 million a year.”

Verden Gang

What exactly was said during the meeting is not clear, but on Monday the Norwegian minster of fishery get on the plain to China. Presumably to try to save the Norwegian/Chinese trade agreement on seafood that has a value of NOK 380 million per year.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has expressed strong displeasure over the choice of Liu Xiaobo as this year’s Nobel Peace Prize laureate.

Spokesperson Ma Zhaoxu issued a statement about one hour after the announcement by the Nobel committee in Norway.

According to Free Tibet, Ma Zhaoxu says the prize should be awarded to people who contribute to world peace through such acts as promoting ethnic reconciliation and friendship among countries.

Zhaoxu reiterated that Liu is serving a prison term for violating Chinese laws, adding that making him a Nobel laureate damages the prize’s prestige.

He warned the decision to award Liu the prize will damage relations between China and Norway.

Trade Agreement In Jeopardy

Several experts believes that the far advanced negotiations on a free trade agreement between Norway and China can come to a halt because of the award, the Norwegian newspaper VG reports.

Negotiations on a free trade agreement applies to all Norwegian products, including fish.

China is expected  to pass Japan as the most important market for Norwegian fish in Asia during this year.

If a Norwegian free-trade agreement with China collapses, the Norwegian fishing industry could lose about NOK 380 million a year, according to the newspaper.

Norwegian Minister of Fisheries, Lisbeth Berg-Hansen, travels to Beijing for political talks already Monday.

She says there are no grounds for sanctions against Norway from the Chinese side.

Prize Winner’s Wife Disappear

Meanwhile, news agencies report Saturday that Mr. Xiaobo’s wife, who made comments to the press yesterday, seem to have have  disappeared.


Shang Baojun


According to Fox News, the mobile phone of, Liu Xia, was turned off Saturday as she was expected to be visiting the prison to meet her husband.

“She’s disappeared. We’re all worried about them,” Liu‘s lawyer, Shang Baojun, told The Associated Press on Saturday.


He says even Liu Xia’s mother had been unable to reach her.


Liu’s wife’s freedom of movement had been shrinking since the eve of the Nobel announcement, when she said police tried to get her out of Beijing, offering her a prison visit with Liu.

She instead planned to hold a news conference with reporters Friday night, but police would not let her leave her apartment.


Liu Xia


She was negotiating terms to visit Liu on Saturday and tell him the news.

Police often force political critics, religious dissenters and sometimes their family members to leave Beijing ahead of sensitive anniversaries, often putting them up in guesthouses and keeping them out-of-the-way for days and weeks.

Beth Schwanke with the Washington-based Freedom Now, an organization that serves as Liu’s international counsel, says, “We’re very concerned that the government might use this as a pretext for detaining her.”

“I think by the end of today if she has not reappeared, there will be a big brouhaha,” Nicholas Bequelin, Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch, says.


News Being Sencored

Chinese authorities appear to have jammed foreign news reports that Liu Xiaobo is the winner of this year’s Nobel Peace Prize, the Free Tibet reports.

Broadcasts of international TV programs across China were blacked out during reports about the prize, apparently in a bid to block the news from Chinese citizens.

A news program on NHK World Premium was blacked out on Friday afternoon while a report on Liu was being aired, and returned to normal when the story ended.

Other news organizations including CNN and BBC World were also blacked out during peace prize stories.

In China, the state-run Xinhua news agency and China Central Television have yet to report Liu has won the Nobel Peace Prize.



Comments Off on Peace Prize: China Furious, Hectic Diplomacy, Wife Disappears

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics

China To Dump Euro?

First Japan, now China. Two of the worlds largest savers are thinking about getting rid of their holdings in the troubled European currency. Just a few months ago, the mighty Asians announced plans to reduce their dollar reserves in favor of the euro. Now the tables have turned completely.

“This is a big strategic shift. Last year, the Chinese were trying to reduce their exposure to dollar assets by buying euro zone assets. This would be a complete reversal.”

Anonymous investor (Financial Times)

Representatives of China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, which manages the reserves under the country’s central bank, has been meeting with foreign bankers in Beijing in recent days to discuss a reduction of euro related assets in the nations foreign exchange reserves, the Financial Times reports.

We have already heard that Japanese investors – some of the worlds’ largest savers – have turned extremely negative on the euro.

Now it’s being reported that the Chinese officials of SAFE, the state administration of foreign exchange – who are the world’s largest investors – are evaluating their holding of euros.

China, which boasts the world’s largest foreign exchange reserves, is reviewing its holdings of euro zone debt in the wake of the crisis that has swept through the region’s bond markets, the Financial Times writes.

The importance of this news is not so much that it signifies a sudden short-term withdrawal of funds, but a long-term strategic shift.

70% per cent of China’s official reserves of $2.5 trillion are invested in dollar assets, and China had planned to re-balance this portfolio in favor of euros – which would have strengthened the euro’s global role.

The crisis has now reversed this trend – and put paid to any hopes that the euro could benefit from a stronger global role.

(By the way; the euro dropped below $1.22 on the news in Asian trading last night).

One investor says to Financial Times:

“This is a big strategic shift. Last year, the Chinese were trying to reduce their exposure to dollar assets by buying euro zone assets. This would be a complete reversal.”

A spokesman for SAFE refused to comment.

An estimated 70% of China’s foreign reserves are held in U.S. dollar securities, but the composition and management of the funds controlled by SAFE are regarded as state secrets.

However, analysts point out that SAFE rarely cuts its existing holdings significantly, due to the vast amount  of new money to invest every month.

Instead, it reduces the proportion of new investment devoted particular assets, and thereby reducing the weighting of that asset in its overall portfolio.

According to the latest figures announced by SAFE, the country’s foreign exchange reserves totaled almost 2,5 trillion dollar at the end of March, up by USD 174 billion in just six months.

Separately, a Chinese diplomat says he is “worried about” the effect of Europe’s debt crisis and the weakness of the euro on the global recovery and China’s country’s exports.

“The euro’s fluctuation will have an impact on China’s thinking, but it’s only one element” in any decision to allow the Chinese currency to rise vice foreign minister He Yafei  says, according to Bloomberg.

China’s official reserves have been growing at a rapid pace for years, driven by inflows of foreign capital, a large trade surplus and restrictive cross-border capital controls.

SAFE, which holds an estimated $630 billion of euro zone bonds in its reserves, has expressed concern about its exposure to the five so-called peripheral euro zone markets of Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain.

Any move by SAFE would mark a significant change in direction, as Beijing has been trying to diversify away from the US dollar in recent years by buying a greater proportion of assets denominated in other currencies.

The consequences of such action by Chinese authorities can only be imagined.

Market Snap Shots

Today’s movement in eur/usd illustrates more than anything else that investors are not sure what to believe.

However, after a short rally earlier Thursday, the RSI is now overbought, and a reaction down can be expected any time soon.



Pretty much the same pattern in the eur/jpy relation.

Related by the Econotwist:

Merkel, Obama, Sarkozy Have Investors Shitting Their Pants

European Banks: “Leman Times Ten”

Welcome Back to Earth, Mr. Market

Proposal For New Single European Bond

RBS Analyst Warns Investors

Euro-Slide Continues After Spanish Bank Rescue

Albert Edwards: Europe On The Edge Of A Deflationary Precipice

“Sending Europe Back To The 1950′s”

Fitch: Credit Markets Still Deteriorating

Stock Market Guru: Sell Everything!


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics