It’s called a “blowback”……
Obviously related articles:
- Cisco expects 10% sales dive over US spying (pcpro.co.uk)
- Cisco warns US spying fallout hitting revenue in China (news.in.msn.com)
- US technology companies including Cisco and IBM face unprecedented difficulties selling services in China due to spying fallout – @Reuters (reuters.com)
- Cisco’s disastrous quarter shows how NSA spying could freeze US companies out of a trillion-dollar opportunity (rhythmicam.wordpress.com)
- Why Facebook just had a blowout quarter (qz.com)
- The NSA Leaks Have Been Crushing US Tech Sales In China (businessinsider.com)
Cisco(s csco) has shocked financial analysts — who were expecting healthy growth — by predicting a 10 percent sales slump during the current quarter. There are a variety of reasons for this, but the standout one is the backlash in emerging markets against the activities of the U.S. signals intelligence agency, the NSA.
This shouldn’t have come as a surprise. Communications infrastructure is absolutely central to the surveillance scandal, and that’s Cisco’s business. An American networking firm was never going to come out of this mess well – and the whole infrastructure business is in a state of upheaval anyway — but the figures are sobering nonetheless.
In the last quarter, on which Cisco was reporting on Wednesday, the company saw a sudden 21 percent revenue drop in its top 5 emerging markets: 25 percent down in Brazil, 18 percent down in India, Mexico and China, and 30 percent down…
View original post 458 more words
Comments Off on Cisco’s Gloomy Forecast Shows NSA Effect Is Starting To Hit Home
Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, Technology
After two years and two months of investigations the EU commission have reached a preliminary conclusion: 13 major banks cooperated with the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and data service provider Markit to prevent credit derivatives from being traded on public exchanges so they could maintain their lucrative income from the unregulated €10 Trillion over-the-counter (OTC) market.
“Over-the-counter trading is not only more expensive for investors than exchange trading, it is also prone to systemic risks.”
“If, after the parties have exercised their rights of defence, the Commission concludes that there is sufficient evidence of an infringement, it can issue a decision prohibiting the conduct and impose a fine of up to 10% of a company’s annual worldwide turnover,” the EU commission says in a press release.
The European Commission has informed some of the world’s largest investment banks of its preliminary conclusion that they infringed EU antitrust rules that prohibit anti-competitive agreements by colluding to prevent 
exchanges from entering the credit derivatives business between 2006 and 2009, according to a press release dated July 1.
However, sending a letter of objections to the banks on institutions involved does not prejudge the final outcome of the investigation, the commission adds.
“Between 2006 and 2009, Deutsche Börse and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange tried to enter the credit derivatives business. The exchanges turned to ISDA and Markit to obtain necessary licenses for data and index benchmarks, but, according to the preliminary findings of the Commission, the banks controlling these bodies instructed them to license only for “over-the-counter” (OTC) trading purposes and not for exchange trading. Several of the investment banks also sought to shut out exchanges in other ways, for example by coordinating the choice of their preferred clearing house.”
“The Commission takes the preliminary view that the banks acted collectively to shut out exchanges from the market because they feared that exchange trading would have reduced their revenues from acting as intermediaries in the OTC market.”
Adding Fuel to the Fire
The main components of the credit derivative market is the CDO’s (Colleteralized Debt Obligation) and the Credit Default Swaps (CDS).
The swaps have caused substantial volatility in the financial markets over the last years as these derivatives, used to hedge national public debt obligations, has caused significant additional costs to troubled countries like Greece, Spain, Ireland and Italy.
The following 13 financial institutions are suspected of violating article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) that prohibits anti-competitive agreements.
Additionally, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and data service provider Markit are suspected to have participated in the rigging of the huge credit derivative market with an estimated size of ten times the global GDP.
“It would be unacceptable if banks collectively blocked exchanges to protect their revenues from over-the-counter trading of credit derivatives. Over-the-counter trading is not only more expensive for investors than exchange trading, it is also prone to systemic risks,” commission Vice President in charge of competition policy, Joaquín Almunia, says in the statement.
The EU says it will prohibit the banks from this kind of trading, and/or impose a fine of up to 10% of their annual global revenue, if the allegations are true.
Of course it’s true. The list of banks above are the same banks suspected, charged and convicted of a series of market violations over the last five years – from lying to investors about their risk exposure, to manipulation of asset prices and fixing interest rates.
But they will – of course – fight this allegations, too, to the bitter end, seeking to haul out the case as long as possible and eventually agree on a settlement with the EU commission excepting an insignificant fine and another little slap on the wrist.
Case closed. Se you next time around!
More criminal records:
Other Related articles:
.
Office 2012 HOMEless Edition
Trade With Attitude
Optimize Your System
Twisted News
REUTERS FINANCIAL TIMES THE WALL STREET JOURNAL WIRED SCIENCE DAILY NEWS.COM
