The allegations against IMF boss Dominique Strauss-Kahn comes at the worst possible time. The euro zone’s contagious financial crisis constitutes the biggest threat to global financial stability today, and at a time when good leadership is more needed the ever before. If the position as IMF leader is not filled immediately, we’re all in big trouble.
“I cannot imagine who could replace him.“
If it wasn’t a political crisis in Europe before last weekend, it’s certainly is now. The charges against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is a tragedy in several ways. It will be an extremely difficult task for anyone to step in and take over the management of the biggest economic rescue operation of our time. And I can’t really see any obvious candidates.
I’m not making excuses for Mr. Strauss-Kahn. He has to take what’s coming to him.
He is the only leader in Europe who seem to have some kind of oversight of the situation. He’s the only one who’s able to make compromises and come up with solutions that all the confused politicians in the divided union are able to accept.
What is perhaps not so much appreciated outside the euro zone has been the IMF’s political role in keeping the euro zone’s rescue strategy on track.
He supported the view, also held by the European Central Bank, that a euro zone member should not rush into default.
The euro zone clearly needed the IMF’s technical competences in dealing with its sovereign debt crises – a set of skills largely absent in the European institutions.
“Mr Strauss-Kahn proved to be a bold decision-maker, an effective politician and a competent economist.“
The highly respected commentator at Financial Times, Martin Wolf, writes:
“Mr Strauss-Kahn was among the very few senior European policymakers to whom the German leadership, particularly Angela Merkel, the chancellor, paid attention. At crucial moments, he was able to bring Europeans together. Indeed, he even seemed able to bring a divided German government together. I cannot imagine who could replace him. When there exist so many divisions within Europe and the decisions ahead are so complex and fraught, his absence will be keenly felt.“
Martin Wolf also points out:
“Mr Strauss-Kahn turned out to be the right man in the right job at the right time. Initially, I had my doubts about the appointment of yet another Frenchman and a politician, at that, to run such a central international institution. I was wrong. Mr Strauss-Kahn proved to be a bold decision-maker, an effective politician and a competent economist. This combination is very rare. None of the candidates under discussion is likely to do the job as well as he did during the worst of the global and then euro zone financial crises.“
A French, A Mexican or A Turk?
Looking at the bookmakers charts, it seems most likely that Strauss-Kahn’s successor will be Turkish.
They hold former Turkish finance minister Kermal Dervis as the most likely candidate, with only 5 – 2 in odds.
Christine Lagarde, however, stands to a payout of 14 – 1 if she should get the job.
Here’s the full bookmakers list, provided by The Economist:
There are also several other good arguments against another European IMF leader.
Wolfgang Munchau at eurointelligence.com explain:
The various candidates mentioned as potential successors to Mr Strauss-Kahn are technically skilled, but in assessing their relative merits, we should take into account that the new IMF chief will deal with mostly European issues for most of his or her first term at the top level.
He or she will have to bang heads together in meetings of European finance ministers, and will have to converse effectively with some notoriously difficult heads of government and state.
Whoever is appointed should, in principle, be able to have the German chancellor’s ear. Mr Strauss-Kahn did.
A PhD in economics and an extensive experience in dealing with financial instability may be desirable qualities. But at a time like this, they are not sufficient. The game has changed.“
Wolfgang Munchau continuous:
“The Europeans have monopolised this position. That must stop, and it will stop.
But now, and probably for the first time, we may actually need a European managing director – at least a director with some knowledge and experience of European affairs.
The Europeans would be foolish to let go of this position at a time like this.
There are plenty of excellent candidates, including Christine Lagarde, the French finance minister.
The reason is not an attempt to cling on to power. The reason is to ensure that the job gets done.“
Related by the Econotwist’s:
- IMF Boss In Jail After Sexual assault
- Financial Monsters Threaten Democracy, Former Portuguese President Says
- Egypt Asks IMF for $10bn Loan
- Greece Hits Strike 10, Violence Erupt Again
- Who Could Replace Strauss-Kahn? (huffingtonpost.com)
- Could next IMF head come from outside Europe? (usatoday.com)
- If Strauss-Kahn is out, who might become IMF chief? (csmonitor.com)
- Europe moves to protect claim to top IMF job (theglobeandmail.com)