Topic: Sovereign Debt – Too Hot To Handle?

A Sovereign Chapter 9 Filing?

As the crisis in our financial system slowly fades out, a new and possible more severe crises emerge; the sovereign debt crisis.

These problems have been highlighted lately by countries like Dubai, Greece, Iceland and Spain, among others. There’s no clear solution on the table, yet. And the measures discussed by our politicians are mostly short-term-quick-fix arrangements. So, we need permanent solutions on how to handle this long term problem. The extensive need and political opportunity have aligned, and the risks of not taking action are too serious to be ignored.

We need good ideas. If you have any suggestions, please share.

“In 2001, Anne Krueger of the IMF proposed a Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (SDRM) where a super-majority of creditors would vote to negotiate new terms under a restructuring agreement,” researcher Anna Gibson with the international think tank Re-Define writes in a blog post.

Anna Gibson suggest a global sovereign bankruptcy law, similar to the US chapter 9 bankruptcy code:

“This includes the internationalization of Chapter 9 of the US bankruptcy code, originally intended to provide financially distressed municipalities with protection from creditors. Like municipalities, sovereign nations are unable to be liquidated, and thus their approach to debt resolution must come with realistic outcomes in mind for both debtors and creditors, whilst the model also includes the treatment of both bilateral and multilateral debt, a considerable deficiency of the SDRM proposed by IMF,” she writes.

What do you think?



Filed under Laws and Regulations

11 responses to “Topic: Sovereign Debt – Too Hot To Handle?

  1. Hi, i just needed to come here to let you know about a seriously inexpensive service that posts comments like this on millions of WordPress blogs. Why you might ask, well you may wish to sell a product or service and target webmasters or merely just improve the amount of backlinks your web site has that will increase your Google rankins which will then bring your web site more traffic and money. Take a quick look at this website for more information.

  2. The following time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I imply, I know it was my option to read, but I actually thought youd have one thing fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you might repair for those who werent too busy looking for attention.

  3. Spot on with this write-up, I really think this website wants much more consideration. I?ll in all probability be once more to read far more, thanks for that info.

  4. I precisely wanted to appreciate you once again. I do not know the things I might have done without the type of ways shown by you concerning such subject. It actually was a very horrifying circumstance in my position, however , being able to see your professional form you managed the issue took me to weep for fulfillment. I’m thankful for your service and then hope that you recognize what a great job you are always providing instructing other individuals thru your website. More than likely you’ve never met all of us.

    • Wow!
      Well, thank you very much for those – far too kind – words.

      It is, however, all I need to keep going. I always question and second guess myself, and will always do, and you will never know how important your feedback is to me.

      That goes for my critics , too 😉 Without those, I wouldn’t be able to improve my skills.



  5. Pingback: Topic: Sovereign Debt- Want To Buy A Greek Island? « MoonTalk

  6. Pingback: Topic: Sovereign Debt – The Only Solution? « MoonTalk

  7. cjenscook

    I see you launched at the Full Moon, but the black background could do with lightening up, I think!

    If you are looking for ideas, mine are based on 25 years of market regulation and development, six of them as a director of a global energy exchange, and ten in the area where markets and the Internet intersect.

    As someone said in Iran not long ago, we can’t solve 21st century problems with 20th century solutions. Yet we continue to think that legal models, such as Companies, which originated in the early 17th century, and a central bank-centric credit model originated in France by a Scottish gambler in 1719 are still appropriate today.

    As Nassim Taleb and Willem Buiter agree, since more debt is unsustainable, the solution must lie in equity.

    My approach to a sovereign Chapter 9 would be a debt/equity swap. But not equity as we know it.

    For instance Iceland could consolidate all public debt into a new single consolidated class of undated redeemable credit Units. Not unlike the UK’s anachronistic undated Consols and War Loan.

    They would pay a return – possibly index-linked, probably energy-linked – on these Units, and could redeem them at any time.

    That would both not only drastically cut Iceland’s financing cost, but also it would be a first class investment, because it is:

    (a) Secure – since affordability = certainty;

    (b) Liquid -since there would be one single class of quasi equity, rather than classes of debt fragmented by dates and interest rates; and if investors don’t buy, Iceland probably could buy them back.

    In other words an Icelandic National Equity.

    It’s not Rocket Science – I think of it as ‘Open’ Capital.

  8. Pingback: I Sincerely Thank You! « Econotwist's Blog