Tag Archives: United States

Can You Win a War With Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence?

Is it really possible to identify, and calculate the severity, of potential military treats by using algorithms and open source data? The US Navy seem to think so. Moreover, the Navy wants you – researchers, coders and other creative computer  geeks – to help them write this software.

“ We want to do business with educational institutions, nonprofit and for-profit organizations with ground-breaking ideas, pioneering scientific research and novel technology developments.”

Office of Naval Research

biocyc_pathwaytools

It was actually the tech pros over at wired.com that put me on to the Office of Naval Research and their ongoing activities. I’ll tell you, these guys have some amazing projects underway! DNA-computers, broadband connected helmets with the ability to communicate directly with a soldiers brain, radio frequencies that can do several things at once, mathematical models (algorithms) that not only can predict human behaviour but also influence people.

It is one of three main areas of research at the moment; to put together a network of different sensors (thermometers, microphones. webcams, you-name-it) connected to one powerful supercomputer who is able to calculate and predict whatever the US Navy wants to know.

spying-on-you“Better algorithms that can enable the development of “key technologies that will enable rapid, accurate decision-making by autonomous processes in complex, time varying highly dynamic environments that are probed with heterogeneous sensors and supported by open source data,” according to a new call for research papers from the Office of Naval Research.

One of its new special program announcements for 2013 identifies software algorithms as a major point of concern: It wants more robust logic tools play nicely across hardware and software platforms, pre-assembling a mosaic of threats.

One subset of that research is called Sensor Management and Allocation. Its goal: to “optimally task and re-task large sensors networks [sic] based on current picture and sensor availability to understand the battle space and maintain dynamic persistent surveillance.

AI Mirror - 400A related effort, called Automated Image Understanding, gets more explicit. It’s about “detection and tracking of objects on water or in urban areas and inferring the threat level they may pose” — sharply enough that the algorithm should be able to pick out “partially occluded objects in urban clutter.”

All this in real-time, of course.

Notice that the Navy isn’t talking about developing new hardware that can automatically spot the dangerous, partially concealed things in water or in urban areas. It’s got that stuff already, and on deckThe new algorithms are about making all of that gear much, much smarter, and more deeply integrated — or, at least, it might, if defense hardware manufacturers’ software weren’t proprietarywired.com notes.

Technically speaking, the challenge here is to figure out how to represent distant objects caught within a field of vision as threatening; calculating the degree of threat; and weighting those threats when integrating them with either different images or images of the same field at an earlier time. Narrow your field too finely and you’ll miss threats; widen it too much and you’ll be awash in information.

The Navy, however, also want algorithms that calculates the level of uncertainty.

“If the process is to be automated and timely relative to a mission, then algorithms must be implemented that can sense, interpret, reason and successfully act in an open world with uncertain, incomplete, imprecise, and contradictory data.”

MORE@ “Irreducible Uncertainty and the Limits of Predictability

.

What’s So Great About DNA Computing?

It’s another main research are of the US Navy, and I can assure you that this is not just another fancy toy.

49a74e495a5fBy definition, DNA computing is a form of computing which uses DNAbiochemistry and molecular biology, instead of the traditional silicon-based computer technologies.

That’s right. It means implementing human (organic) materials into a computer chip.

The original idea of DNA computing was to find a more effective way to solve  NP-hard problems., (NP-hard problems may be of any type: decision problemssearch problems, or optimizational), because a DNA-based microchip is able to handle many more processes at the same time, compared to the traditional silicon chip.

And with those heavy algorithms the US Navy are imagining, they probably need one.

But there’s more. The Navy is particularly interested in “DNA-Based Molecular-Scale Nanofabrication.”

By combining DNA computing with nanotechnology it is probably possible to manipulate or change human DNA of living people, according to research.

“The program seeks to exploit the extraordinary combination of resolution, throughput and flexibility of DNA nanotechnology to build functional electronic and computational devices and systems.”

Now, we’re talking!

MORE@”DNA-Based Molecular-Scale Nanofabrication

.

Replacing Heads?

tech solutionsThe last, but not least, important task for the US Navy is to develop a new high-tech helmet, with a built-in broadband connection and the ability to interact with soldiers, through images, audio and even remotely change the mindset, the mood  and the body chemistry of those who wear it.

I better explain:

According to the Office for Naval Research the intention behind developing a new helmet made of something called polymer is to reduce the number of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) during combat.

The research concentration areas are described as:

  • Theory, molecular simulation, computer-aided materials design
  • Polymer synthesis, polymer formulation and characterization
  • Dynamic mechanical analysis and other characterization methods of polymer dynamics
  • High-rate loading, constitutive modeling of the polymer, nonlinear dynamic simulation of the multi-system (helmet/elastomer/head) and shock tube testing

300px-Syndiotactic_polypropeneBut Polymer is a very interesting material. Among other capabilities it can store information.

Ploymer can also be used to make optoelectrical devices, such as light-emitting diodes, transistors, molecular switches, photovoltaic cells, chemical and biological sensors, and large-area flexible displays, and so on….

MORE@”Elastomeric Polymer-by-Design to Protect the Warfighter Against Traumatic Brain Injury by Diverting the Blast Induced Shock Waves from the Head

Connect this helmet to the DNA computers, running the super-algorithms, and you got………..an intelligent but very ugly hat, making you look unpredictable stupid.

As said before: Artificial intelligence is no match for human stupidity.

DOWNLOAD:

  1. Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) for Navy and Marine Corps Science and Technology
  2. Basic Research Challenge (BRC) Program

Related by the econoTwist’s:

2 Comments

Filed under Laws and Regulations, International Econnomic Politics, Technology

USA Ready to Launch Cyber Attack, NSA Chief Says

It should not come as a surprise to anyone, but never before has an American  official acknowledged that the US government is working on or is in possession of malware capable of attacking a foreign nation in a cyber conflict, despite the fact that at least one attack – the famous Stuxnext worm – has been attributed to the USA.

“I would like to be clear that this team, this defend-the-nation team, is not a defensive team.”

Keith Alexander

keithalexandeer

For the first time, NSA chief and head of the US Cyber Command Gen. Keith Alexander admitted America is ready to attack in cyberspace, website Mashable.com reports. On Wednesday, in his annual testimony to the House Armed Services Committee, Alexander took the cyber war rhetoric coming out of Washington up a notch: “I would like to be clear that this team, this defend-the-nation team, is not a defensive team,” he said. “This is an offensive team.

In other words, this cyber army is ready to retaliate in case of a cyber attack against the United States.

As part of the expansion of the cyber security force, Alexander also said that he is adding 40 teams, 13 focused on offensive operations and 27 for surveillance and training. Thanks to the expansion, the cyber command will grow from 900 to a corps of more than 4.000 employees.

As previously reported, the new command will have three arms: two defensive ones that will secure critical infrastructure and the Pentagon‘s own system, and an offensive one. This expansion, Alexander explained, is justified by the imminent threat of a cyber attack on US critical infrastructure, like its power grid or the financial system.

According to Alexander, this kind of attack poses a major threat, even bigger than a terrorist attack.

Well, that’s what experts have been saying for years….

The most important question now is not if the US will respond to the continuously ongoing cyber attacks against corporations and government institutions all over the world, but when, and how

FULL POST@Mashable.com

Related by econoTwist’s:

 

 

4 Comments

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, Technology

Fight For Your Right To Privacy (Or Someone Else Will)

It’s not like the citizens of Europe are taking to the streets to defend their right to keep their private dataprivate. They are probably not quite sure who to defend themself against. But an increasing number ofacademics and intellectuals across the EU are now lining up as the frontline in the upcoming battle of electronic consumer data. The computer industry lures with huge national income and millions of new jobs if they just get complete  access to the information about your online activity stored in hundreds of large databases around the world.

 “The fact that so many came to sign the position actually shows that the situation is serious.”

Kai Rannenberg

lobby

Leading academics across Europe are signing an online petition to support the European Commission’s draft data protection regulation in protest at industry lobbying to weaken it. So far, more than 80 professors from computer science, law, economics and business administration disciplines have joined. The industry’s hunt for profit could seriously undermine people’s trust in companies who want to use their personal data, they warn,  pointing out the financial risk involved.

The outraging professors refers to a study conducted by the US based firm, Boston Consulting Group, that states profit potential could be seriously undermined if people do not trust companies who want to use their personal data. The group estimates €440 billion in 2020 in the EU alone is at risk if the industry fails to establish a trusted flow of data.

The computer industry’s lobbyists, on the other hand, are waving with surveys that says the companies will generate $1.1 trillion in revenue in 2015, while creating nearly 14 million new jobs worldwide.

It may seem like the two conflicting parties are living in two separate worlds, (and to some degree they do), but soon we will all be united in one big global network called “The Cloud“.

“Currently, companies can process personal data without client consent if they can argue that they have a legitimate interest in the use of that data. So far, unfortunately, the term “legitimate interest” leaves plenty of room for interpretation: When is an interest legitimate and when is it not?”

You see, there are two things going on here:

Writing Their Own Laws

First, the development of what the geeks call cloud computing, which means that data is stored on random servers around the globe instead of your own hard disk. This new technology is expected to change the whole computer business radically, making it possible to access and analyze large amount of information anywhere in the world.

Second, the EU commission is about to finalize an update of the 18-year-old directive that aims to bring the law in line with the latest technologies. And this is where the privacy issue comes in.

FULL POST@Rational Arrogance

Comments Off

Filed under Laws and Regulations, International Econnomic Politics, Technology