Tag Archives: European Union

Fight For Your Right To Privacy (Or Someone Else Will)

It’s not like the citizens of Europe are taking to the streets to defend their right to keep their private dataprivate. They are probably not quite sure who to defend themself against. But an increasing number ofacademics and intellectuals across the EU are now lining up as the frontline in the upcoming battle of electronic consumer data. The computer industry lures with huge national income and millions of new jobs if they just get complete  access to the information about your online activity stored in hundreds of large databases around the world.

 “The fact that so many came to sign the position actually shows that the situation is serious.”

Kai Rannenberg

lobby

Leading academics across Europe are signing an online petition to support the European Commission’s draft data protection regulation in protest at industry lobbying to weaken it. So far, more than 80 professors from computer science, law, economics and business administration disciplines have joined. The industry’s hunt for profit could seriously undermine people’s trust in companies who want to use their personal data, they warn,  pointing out the financial risk involved.

The outraging professors refers to a study conducted by the US based firm, Boston Consulting Group, that states profit potential could be seriously undermined if people do not trust companies who want to use their personal data. The group estimates €440 billion in 2020 in the EU alone is at risk if the industry fails to establish a trusted flow of data.

The computer industry’s lobbyists, on the other hand, are waving with surveys that says the companies will generate $1.1 trillion in revenue in 2015, while creating nearly 14 million new jobs worldwide.

It may seem like the two conflicting parties are living in two separate worlds, (and to some degree they do), but soon we will all be united in one big global network called “The Cloud“.

“Currently, companies can process personal data without client consent if they can argue that they have a legitimate interest in the use of that data. So far, unfortunately, the term “legitimate interest” leaves plenty of room for interpretation: When is an interest legitimate and when is it not?”

You see, there are two things going on here:

Writing Their Own Laws

First, the development of what the geeks call cloud computing, which means that data is stored on random servers around the globe instead of your own hard disk. This new technology is expected to change the whole computer business radically, making it possible to access and analyze large amount of information anywhere in the world.

Second, the EU commission is about to finalize an update of the 18-year-old directive that aims to bring the law in line with the latest technologies. And this is where the privacy issue comes in.

FULL POST@Rational Arrogance

Comments Off

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, Technology

Neutral Stupidity

The EU lawmakers are about to finalize rules for a single supervisory mechanism (SSM) coordinated by the ECB. The European Commission is expected to table legislation for a resolution mechanism to wind up ailing banks within the coming months. European Central Bank (ECB) chief Mario Draghi said on Monday in the European Parliament that a euro zone banking union will need a common resolution fund, and that it has to be “fiscally neutral over the medium term.” How can another European bank bailout fund be fiscally neutral?

 ”The European Resolution Fund should be backed by a public backstop mechanism to ensure that it would be fiscally neutral over the medium term.”

Mario Draghi

gal_5113

Yup..neutral, but only over the medium term. Sooner or later the taxpayers will have to pay for this bailout, too…

Speaking with MEPs on the monetary affairs committee, Draghi said that the resolution fund should be financed via levies to safeguard against having to “recourse to taxpayer money,” the EUobserver.com reports.

Levies, hu?

ESMHere are some related words:

Also, the European Resolution Fund “should be backed by a public backstop mechanism,”  Mr. Draghi added, to ensure that it would be “fiscally neutral over the medium term.”

I’m sorry, but this sounds like pure nonsense to me.

There’s nothing new here – just another way to ensure that the bailout mechanisms already set up by the EU  leaders – the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM) – will still be in place when the European banking union becomes a reality.

But the need for a pan-European resolution fund is widely accepted among most EU lawmakers. However, some countries fear it could lead to their taxpayers financing bank rescues in other countries.

Well, I think they’re on to something….

Meanwhile, Draghi continues to kick the can, downplaying the recent diplomatic row over the exchange rate policy of the euro, dismissing it as “excessive” talks of a currency war involving the euro zone, Japan and the US.

He also said that the ECB did not regard the euro zone exchange rate as “a policy target, but it is important for growth and price stability.”

Important, but not a target….

And, according to the bank’s economic forecasts, the euro zone economy will fall by 0.3 percent in 2013, although Draghi indicated that he expected “a gradual recovery later this year.”

Heard that one, too…..quite a few times over the last five years.

bailout_packages

Related by econoTwist’s:

Other related articles:

1 Comment

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, National Economic Politics

New Year – New Focus

First of all: Thanks to all followers of the econoTwist’s TWISTED blog! You know that the purpose of this blog is to raise awareness about the increasing threats from cyberspace. And it seems like my small contribution has contributed to just that. Cyber security is now on the agenda amongst most leading politicians, authorities and regulators. The topic has also found its way to the headlines of the mainstream media.

This does not mean that my work here is done. But I’ve decided to change my main focus for 2013 towards another serious threat; the threat against one of the basic human rights, the freedom of speech. Including freedom of the Press, (both off and online), and media pluralism.

Never before has so many journalist been jailed as in 2012, never before have so many journalist got killed as in 2012. Strong forces, not seen in the media industry before,  are now trying to gain control over the internet, control the information, bloggers and independent writers are under pressure, the mainstream media, too, and never before has so few publishers dominated the mass media market, large corporations who belive that the sole purpose of media is to advertize and sell stuff.

It’s a real threat to our democracy.

So, here we go: Introducing RATIONAL ARROGANCE – a brand new WordPress blog, dedicated to this particular subject. EconoTwist’s style, of course…

Click the pick and check it out!

media-deception-for-rr

.

The econoTwist’s TWISTED site will still be updated, but not as frequently as before. And some stories will be published at both sites.

For those of you who would like to keep an eye on me and my writings, I recommend following my Twitter accounts; “fhxx” or “econotwist”.

I wish you all a happy new year!

.

3 Comments

Filed under Laws and Regulations, Philosophy