Tag Archives: Business

French Senate Start Taxing High-Frequency Trading In January

According to a report by Ulrika Lomas of Tax-News.com, the French Senate, with its left-wing majority, has approved plans to establish a tax on automated transactions in France, to curb the rapid rise in high frequency trading.

“This form of trading merely serves to derail the markets and lamented the lack of visibility for both investors and issuers and the lack of contribution to the country’s real economy.”

Nicole Bricq

Proposed by general budget rapporteur Nicole Bricq, the tax had been adopted by the Senate finance committee recently, highfrequencytrading911.com writes.

The new initiative proposes to impose from January 1, 2012, a tax on certain investment service providers in cases where daily cancellation rates for orders for buying and selling financial instruments on public markets exceed 50%.

Bricq warns that this form of trading “merely serves to derail the markets and lamented the lack of visibility for both investors and issuers and the lack of contribution to the country’s real economy.”

Commenting on its decision to back the plans at the time, the Senate finance committee pointed to the “flash crash” stock market crash of May 6, 2010 in the US and to the stock market crash in Europe in August of this year, which, it argued, served to fuel the controversy surrounding both the impact and the usefulness of high frequency trading.

And the controversy continues….

 

2 Comments

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, National Economic Politics

Fitch Places Goldman Sachs on Negative Credit Watch

This is interesting: Fitch Ratings have just announced that the agency has placed The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.‘s ‘A+/F1+’ long- and short-term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) and ‘a+’ Viability Rating (VR) on Rating Watch Negative. A whole bunch of major global banks gets the same treatment. I don’t think it matters that much to Mr. Blankfein & Co, thou – after all they’re just doing “God’s Work” – but it sends a signal to the market, adding a few more drops of uncertainty.

“Any adverse rating outcome would likely be limited to a one-notch downgrade of the long- and short-term IDRs, given the company’s stronger balance sheet and enhanced liquidity position relative to historical norms.”

Fitch Ratings

“In conjunction with a broad, global review of financial institutions and more specifically, global trading and universal banks, Fitch has placed several issuers on Rating Watch Negative, including Goldman Sachs (GS). Refer to the NRAC entitled ‘Fitch Places Seven Global Trading and Universal Banks on Rating Watch Negative,” the rating agency says in a press release.

Fitch believes that GS’s business model, like other global trading and universal banks face structural challenges given its wholesale funding profile and greater reliance on trading revenues.

“Fitch recognizes the steps GS has taken to diversify and extend its funding sources, as well as to de-lever its balance sheet, which will be reviewed in the context of other global financial institutions.”

The resolution of the Rating Watch Negative, which is expected to occur in the near term, will be based upon further analysis of the company and its peers, Fitch adds.

“Any adverse rating outcome would likely be limited to a one-notch downgrade of the long- and short-term IDRs, given the company’s stronger balance sheet and enhanced liquidity position relative to historical norms. This, combined with its leading positions in global capital markets are key franchise strengths supporting the firm’s ratings.”

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is a global bank, providing underwriting, trading, financial advisory, asset management and securities services.

Business activities are now divided into four segments:

–Investment Banking;
–Institutional Client Services;
–Investing and Lending; and
–Investment Management.

Fitch places the following ratings on Rating Watch Negative:

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) ‘A+’;
– Long-term senior debt ‘A+’;
– Viability Rating ‘a+’
– Short-term IDR ‘F1+’;
– Commercial paper ‘F1+’;
Short-term debt ‘F1+’;
– Market linked securities ‘A+emr’;
Subordinated debt ‘A’;
Preferred equity ‘A-’.

Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
– Long-term IDR ‘A+’;
– Long-term senior debt ‘A+’;
– Long-term deposits ‘AA-’;
– Short-term IDR ‘F1+’;
– Short-term debt ‘F1+’;
– Short-term deposits ‘F1+’.

Goldman, Sachs & Co.
– Long-term IDR ‘A+’;
– Short-term IDR ‘F1+’;
– Long-term senior debt ‘A+’;
– Short-term debt ‘F1+’.

Goldman Sachs Bank (Europe) Plc
–Senior secured guaranteed debt at ‘A+’;
–Short-term secured guaranteed debt at ‘F1+’;
–Short-term debt at ‘F1+’.

Goldman Sachs International
–Senior secured guaranteed debt at ‘A+’;
–Short-term secured guaranteed debt at ‘F1+’;
–Short-term debt at ‘F1+’.

Goldman Sachs Paris inc. et Cie.
– Long-term IDR ‘A+’;
– Short-term IDR ‘F1+’.

Goldman Sachs Capital I
Trust preferred ‘A-’.

Goldman Sachs Capital II, III
– Preferred equity ‘A-’.

Ultegra Finance Limited
– Long-term senior debt ‘A+’;
– Short-term debt ‘F1+’.

Fitch affirms the following:

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
– Senior unsecured debt FDIC ‘AAA’;
– Short-term debt FDIC guaranteed ‘F1+’;
– Individual ‘B/C’;
– Support ’5′;
– Support Floor ‘NF’.

Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
– Senior unsecured debt FDIC ‘AAA’;
– Short-term debt FDIC guaranteed ‘F1+’;
– Support ’1′.

Related by the EconoTwist’s:

3 Comments

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, National Economic Politics

Chaos in Financial Markets are “Potentially Dangerous for Humanity”

You don’t say! What I find most surprising, however, is that there actually ISCentre for the Study of Capital Market Dysfunctionality: It was founded in 2007 by British Paul Woolley, after working several years as a stock broker, and as economist and adviser at the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Guess he knows what he’s talking about. In an interview with Spiegel Online, Britain’s new found financial guru, Dr Paul Woolley says the market stress in not only dangerous for those who work there, but also for everyone else. And he has some investment advise.

“Stop paying performance fees to managers who increase the worth of funds because it encourages gambling.” 

Paul Woolley

“The developments in recent weeks have made it quite clear that the markets don’t function properly. Things are spinning out of control and are potentially dangerous for society. Only a fraternity of academic high priests connected to the finance markets is still speaking of efficient markets. Still each market participant is pursuing their own selfish interests. The market isn’t reaching equilibrium — it’s falling into chaos,” Dr. Paul Woolley says.

 

Here are some more highlights from the Spiegel interview:

“The finance sector can – and is – growing until it overwhelms the economy. In good years the US finance industry cashes in on more than 40 percent of all corporate profits.” 

“Most fund managers follow only the newest trends and strengthen them by doing so. In the short term that leads to success, but in the long term it leads to a crash. “

“The finance industry is characterized by many innovations. Because the customers hardly understand their innovative products, banks make amazing returns. “

“The big investors are in a position to force their service providers, the banks, fund managers and bankers into better behavior. “

” Big investors should also insist that trading take place on a public market. “

Paul Woolley’s career has spanned the private sector, academia and policy-orientated institutions.

After several years of practical experience in a firm of stockbrokers, latterly as a partner in his firm, he studied Economics at the University of York (UK) receiving BA (1970) and D Phil (1976).

He held the Esmée Fairbairn Lectureship in Finance at York 1970-76, also serving as Specialist Advisor to the House of Lords Committee on the EEC 1975-6.

He then moved to the International Monetary Fund 1976-83, initially as an Economist and later as Advisor and then head of the Division responsible to the Fund’s borrowing and investment activities.

Returning to the UK, he was for four years a Partner and Director on the main board of merchant bank, Baring Brothers and its various subsidiaries.

In 1987 he co-founded, and was Managing Director of, GMO Woolley, the London affiliate of GMO, the Boston-based fund management firm. He was a Partner and served on the main GMO board (1998 – 2003).

He retired as Chairman of GMO Europe in 2006.

He returned to academic life in 2007, funding the Paul Woolley Centre for the Study of Capital Market Dysfunctionality at the London School of Economics.

He is now also Chairman of the Advisory Board for the Centre and a full-time member of the research team.

Similar centres have been set up at the University of Toulouse and at UTS in Sydney.

Mr. Woolley is an Honorary Professor of the University of York, Senior Fellow at LSE and an Adjunct Professor at UTS.

Read the full interview with Dr. Woolley at Spiegel ONLINE.

2 Comments

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, Laws and Regulations, National Economic Politics, Philosophy