Euro Zone: More Fiscal Integration Or Not?

The answer lies with the expected gain from further integration, chief economist for France, Laurence Boone, at Barclays Capital writes in an article published by the EVRO Intelligence. Coordinating fiscal exit strategies would be a good economic argument for further fiscal integration, she argues.

“The financial difficulties of Greece have exposed divergences of views within the union.”

Laurence Boone


Seven years are supposed to be critical for a wedding; it will be ten years for the common currency. Two issues are at the centre of the current frictions across the euro area. There is a short-term issue, related to fiscal difficulties, and there is a longer term issue which is related to “euro imbalances”. In effect, both ask the same question, one that policy makers would rather avoid: more fiscal integration or not?

The answer lies with the expected gain from further integration, chief economist Laurence Boone writes.

On the short-term side, the financial difficulties of Greece have exposed divergences of views within the union. On the one hand, virtuous countries would not like to pay for Greece an

d would rather see Greece pay the price of previous fiscal profligacy. Should Greece fail to adjust, either because the adjustment is too demanding or because it does not want to proceed through a painful adjustment, the country would thus have to default or reschedule its debt.

It is interesting to see from past programs of the International Monetary Fund over the past 20 years that they are a lot more indulgent than those of the EU. The IMF has a strict and transparent process for setting-up the conditions of assistance, in terms of interest rate, amount, and time period. The IMF interest rate for loan would be benign: from 1.25% to 4.25% depending on the tranches of money being lent and the length of the loan, typically from 3 to 5 years.

The amount is expressed in terms of quotas at the IMF, but the IMF has proved flexible enough to go well over the defined amount when necessary.

In addition, the IMF has the means to finance Greece over the next couple of years, especially assuming that the IMF presence would ease the costs of adjustment, as Greece’s monitored adjustment would imply a rapid decline in its funding needs. In this scenario, there is little need for further integration.

On the other hand, some euro member countries or actors seem to think that the euro area is an entity beyond EMU, a political entity, and as such should be able to deal with such issues.

As a result, the IMF should not necessarily be called to deal with an internal problem, but fiscal transfers would be allowed – or not – by fellow euro members – a bit like Switzerland, the United States or any other federation. In practice, however, federations tend to be more politically integrated.

For example in the United States, the general government finances can be equally split between federal, state and the local levels, implying a more fiscal transfers and integration than in the euro area.

So, even when defaulting on its local debt, a US State is still benefiting from federal transfers. Swiss cantons are not allowed to be in disequilibrium either.

From this angle, fiscal integration thus means more money in a common pot through higher transfers, and less sovereignty within the state.

The idea of bilateral loans, the European Monetary Fund or a common debt agency reflects the idea that there should be more fiscal integration across euro countries. Indeed, the “fathers” of the EMF reckon it would require a budget at least equivalent to the current EU budget, while a common debt agency, as suggested by the Belgium prime minister, would imply some form of fiscal solidarity and thus transfers. Accordingly, there would be a supra-national entity that would then ensure that “federal” fiscal measures are enforced.

In this scenario, the economic gains consist of lower interest rates as a result of the solidarity but also from higher transfers across member states that would smooth business cycle fluctuations.

In the longer-term, there is a similar dilemma regarding structural policies.

On the one hand, wage restraint and fiscal restraint would bring competitive advantages and savings for the future.

On the other hand, some argue that if all euro countries were to behave this way, the result would be deflation and depression, as there would be no internal demand growth any more.

Laurence Boone

This argument is fallacious: although intra-euro area trade has reached a high point, euro countries still trade goods, services and capital with the rest of the world.

The euro area countries’ share of trade with the reste of the world, in terms of gross domestic product, is 30%, and the EU is the first exporter and importer of goods and services worldwide, excluding internal trade.

As a result, current account imbalances do not need to be solved within the euro area, as Charles Wyplosz has recently argued.

On the other hand, Germany would benefit from increased demand for its products from its euro partners, should it manage to exit more quickly from both the fiscal trap and from the growth trap. However, this is neither an argument for undoing Germany’s competitiveness gains, nor against fiscal virtue.

It is an argument for coordinating fiscal exit strategies. This, in turn, would be a good economic argument for further fiscal integration.

By Laurence Boone.

Original article at: evrointelligence.com.

Related by the Econotwist:

Here Comes Another Greek Bank Meltdown

“Greece Will Default”

Greek Debt Crisis Become Critical (Again)

Fitch Launch European Loan Repayment Index

Lies, Damned Lies And Statistics

Fitch Expects More European Sovereign Downgrades

Greek Bailout “Backstop” Confidence Trick Already Backfiring

Markets To Test Greece

G7-Countries In Deep Trouble

Merkel: Kick’em Out!

Force The Rich!


The H5F-TV Toolbar; built-in radio- and TV channels, news ticker and email notifier.

*


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
About these ads

119 Comments

Filed under International Econnomic Politics, National Economic Politics

119 responses to “Euro Zone: More Fiscal Integration Or Not?

  1. Hi, Im a webmaster in Paris. Just wanted to tell you I thought your blog was cool. Thanks for updating it!

  2. Useful information, many thanks to the author. It is puzzling to me now, but in general, the usefulness and importance is overwhelming. Very much thanks again and good luck.

  3. This is really a remarkable piece of content, I discovered your web page checking bing for a related material and came to this. I couldnt get to significantly choice info on this posting, so it was great to locate this one. I’ll possibly finish up being again to look at some other posts that you’ve got an additional time.

  4. I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You’ve ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye

  5. Terrific work! This is the type of information that should be shared around the web. Shame on Google for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my website . Thanks =)

  6. Outstanding post, I think people should acquire a lot from this weblog its real user pleasant.

  7. I have to show my thanks to you for rescuing me from this type of predicament. Because of looking throughout the search engines and coming across notions which are not beneficial, I figured my life was done. Living minus the solutions to the issues you’ve fixed by means of your good website is a critical case, and those which may have in a negative way affected my entire career if I hadn’t noticed your site. Your skills and kindness in taking care of everything was precious. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t discovered such a point like this. I can at this moment look forward to my future. Thanks so much for your expert and effective guide. I won’t think twice to propose your blog post to anyone who should receive guidelines on this subject matter.

  8. Valuable info. Lucky me I found your site by accident, and I’m shocked why this accident didn’t happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

  9. Hello there, I found your web site via Google while searching for a related topic, your site came up, it looks great. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  10. Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! By the way, how can we communicate?

  11. pieczatki

    hello!,I like your writing so much! share we communicate more about your article on AOL? I require a specialist on this area to solve my problem. May be that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

  12. I very lucky to find this web site on bing, just what I was looking for : D too saved to favorites .

  13. Exactly what I was looking for, thanks for posting .

  14. I wanted to write you that little bit of note to give thanks as before about the gorgeous tactics you’ve shared on this site. This has been quite extremely generous with people like you in giving freely what numerous people could have supplied as an e book to end up making some money for their own end, especially since you could have tried it if you ever considered necessary. These inspiring ideas also acted to be a good way to realize that some people have the identical passion similar to my personal own to know the truth great deal more with regard to this issue. I know there are millions of more pleasant occasions ahead for many who browse through your blog post.

  15. I am only commenting to let you understand what a brilliant discovery my friend’s girl experienced checking your site. She came to understand such a lot of things, which include what it is like to possess a wonderful helping heart to have a number of people quite simply learn about several impossible subject matter. You truly surpassed our own desires. Thanks for imparting the essential, trustworthy, educational as well as easy thoughts on this topic to Jane.